Re: General Warning Tally for users...
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:44 pm
Isn't that SWST's modus operandi, though?
Starfleet Jedi Forum
http://starfleetjedi.net/forum/
now, this is clearly not complimentary, but is it worth banning me for months when i was sitting at ONE WARNING?mojo wrote: Light Yagami lurks the forum and finds these pictures, then writes Mike Dicenso's name in the notebook in this entry:
'Mike Dicenso dies, 02/15/2012, of an infection after being scratched by MoJo's cat. In his last hours, he writes a 20 page manifesto describing his life, only he writes it as if he were a homosexual furry with a one centimeter long penis who has never had a sexual encounter of any kind.'
-quite clearly implies that THIS IS NOT A NORMAL DESCRIPTION OF MIKE DICENSO. if i were implying that this were the truth, why would i use 'as if'? i actually thought this would save me from even being warned on this one.mojo wrote: ...he writes it as if he were a homosexual furry with a one centimeter long penis who has never had a sexual encounter of any kind.
well, no mike. i did not want a ban. had i wanted a ban, i would have committed a banworthy offense while holding 3 warnings. but it's nice to know that if i ever do, i can have one.Mike Dicenso wrote: Mojo, this is it. You want a ban? You've got it.
-Mike
...which were all banned a year ago at least except for one single puppet which i kept active as a means to appeal things like being banned for ten weeks for one single instance of ultra-mild trolling...Mike Dicenso wrote: And the insanity continues on. Mojo, as well as all his sock puppets.."
..which i am not at all surprised to see have not been listed since they do not exist..Mike Dicenso wrote: ..are hereby banned for 10 weeks minimum for multiple violations
..which i am surprised to see, because this is a frank admission that my massive ban and the permaban he hopes for is being sought by using retroactive warnings for a situation i already served a ban for. very fucking nice..Mike Dicenso wrote:..(Mojo's prior ban was far too short since it did not take into account his sock puppets' rules board violations)..
..indirectly insulting, at best..Mike Dicenso wrote: ..not least of which includes directly insulting..
..ridiculous..Mike Dicenso wrote: ..stalking..
..i frankly admit this one, to some extent.Mike Dicenso wrote: ..and harrassing me.
..because i created a joke thread in which a supernatural book forces you to pretend to be a gay furry virgin. again, very nice.Mike Dicenso wrote: As with SWST, I will place in a request with Jedi Master Spock for Mojo to be permabanned.
..which i would have gladly done, rather than bring it out in the open like this, had i had some way of doing so. but i'm sure you'll blame me for that as well, and extend my ban for defending myself here.Mike Dicenso wrote: If this action is felt to be too harsh, it must be appealed to JMS. Thank you.
-Mike
I can honestly say, having lived with MoJo, that no joke can go to far to him. That's just the way he is. He genuinely meant it to be funny.Mike DiCenso wrote:The problem is this. This goes far, far beyond a joke. It is in fact the second, really the third time that Mojo has directed such personal attacks at me, and for no real reason. It is because of that that I decided to take such an high level of discipline against Mojo, who has also displayed a blatant disregard for the board rules, including the abuse of sock puppets ala KSC's past behavior, which in and of itself is a bannable offense.
-Mike
I understand. I'm just sticking up for a friend. I know that i remember you in a positive light from when I posted regularly on here. And I know from talking to MoJo that there is nothing malicious about it. He, again, GENUINELY thought it was funny.Mike DiCenso wrote:I did not find it funny the first time, and I thought that had been made crystal clear. The board rules here are clear and concise about throwing insults at people, especially at someone who isn't viewing such attention at them as amusing. For some strange reason Mojo has been singling me out, and all apparently because he's miffed that I don't go after SWST the way he thinks I should, never mind that I get more results in making banning against SWST stick more than Praeo did.
That and his writing appears to carry a definite malicious intent behind it. Normally I'd have had Praeo and JMS handle this, as I admittedly am too close to what's going on. But since neither of them are here, I have to do what I'm able under the circumstance, and between everything that's been going on, my patience is at it's end.
-Mike