It's not "fanwank" if it's actually shown and stated in published works. It's magic technobabble and arguably pseudoscience the way Wong et al try and claim it's all reasonable, but it's an established part of the EU. "Fanwank" is when the fans themselves make shit up that isn't in the books.SpaceWizard wrote:Third, you can't annhilate mass without annhilating an equivalent amount of anti-mass, since E-M is an exothermic process. Therefore this "magic" process of producing antimatter is just so much fanwank-- along with the 200GT turbolasers, tne neutronium hulls and the 7-figure hyperdrive speeds.
The ICS power generation claims appear to be rather firmly contradicted at the moment. The existence of hypermatter fuel as such isn't, AFAIK.
You'll have to quote that, because the OT:ICS does says the Death Star was powered by a hypermatter reactor:Fourth and last, the ICS2 is contradicted by the ICSS1, which says that everything-- including the Death Star-- is powered by FUSION.
Making use of the Empire's most advanced discoveries in super-engineering, the Death Star is built around a hypermatter reactor which can generate enough power to destroy an entire planet.