A lot of folks, apparently including the writers at times, have been of the opinion that this would leave the Borg as a powerful but uncreative "race"(*). That is, even if the Borg had need of, say, the internal combustion engine, they wouldn't really be able to fill that need without having assimilated a culture that had them. So, the Borg is powerful, but their Achilles Heel would be, not their interdependency, but their inability to create. To be sure, the Borg come up with ideas, but there's no need to assume that any of them are actually original to any significant degree.TORRES: The Borg gain knowledge through assimilation. What they can't assimilate, they can't understand.
JANEWAY: But we don't assimilate, we investigate, and in this case, that's given us an edge. We've discovered something they need.
I reject that notion.
1. Adapting stolen technology to work with your own is perhaps even more difficult than having created it yourself, in some cases. Just ponder the difficulty converting an old school Mac program to a Windows PC, or converting a Prius to operate with a Ford 302 to create a Monster Prius.
Some creativity required, there.
2. The Borg almost certainly represent the greatest collection of computer processors in the Galaxy. Even without soulful creativity, the simple use of genetic algorithms and computer simulation ought to enable an extraordinary capacity for apparent, if not real, creativity.
For instance . . . and forgive me for going from memory, here . . . an exploratory experiment a decade or so ago with field-programmable gate arrays and genetic algorithms resulted in some unique events. The FPGAs and controlling algorithms were intended to be allowed to self-create some basic computational program that I no longer recall, and the researchers selected the best out of each generation of programs. The system, which had no onboard clock, developed one of its own based not on standard board clocking such as we might've implemented, but instead on a little-used electromagnetic effect in the system, read and then utilized as a clock based on the effects upon the system. The researchers were suitably impressed, once they finally figured out how the devil the programs were achieving clocking.
In other words, much as we recognize and accept days as such, and but for the planetary spin might have no way to distinguish time periods so easily, so too did a little cluster of electronics effectively come to understand days (if even in a Chinese Room way) based on some electromagnetic field spin, as it were.
To be sure, this and other examples of surprising adaptations by genetic algorithms do not represent real creativity. It was a simple utilization of the environment.
Now consider this among the Borg. Ridiculous computational power and obvious desire and intent . . . surely they could select the best act in a situation from a massive pile of genetic algorithm runs.
The end result? I don't think humanity as presented in Trek would stand a chance in any realistic way. Compared to the Borg the Federation is a rounding error, and the merest fraction of the Collective's efforts ought to be enough to create a juggernaut against which no slow human-creativity-based adaptation could stand, no matter how original and inventive and innovative.
But that's just me.
(*) ... an alternate view could simply be that they just don't review sensor readings very much. But, one would expect the Borg quite capable of assessing 8472 DNA without being in actual possession of it. The entire premise of the statement is thus flawed.