Examination of "Elaan of Troyius" warp strafing
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:07 pm
Ok so i just had yet another Leo1 experiance on SB.com with the typical level of moderation bias so i figured i would do this here rather than waiting the 3 days for my ban to be over.
So we have canon dialog to support it warp strafing saying:
1. That the BIG E will be sluggish without warp manouvering.
2. That the hostile ship was attacking at warp speeds.
Now the argument against seems to ignore these two things and claims that the countdown proves that the ship was traveling STL as the ranges and seconds clearly point to sublight.
Now as far as i can see this argument is absurd for several reasons:
1. It ignores the canon dialog regarding speed and warp manouvering.
2. Even if they try to argue a variation of the "picard manouver" with the ship warping in slowing to sublight, firing and then warping out the facts do not fit because the way sulu counts down the approaching ship was moving at around 1500km/s or even slower at ranges starting at 100,000km down to 30,000km or less and if they were doing so what the hell was soooo difficult for the BIG E to hit them or catch them for that matter as the BIG E still had impulse drive and power as well as torps ect (the BIG E has a range of at least 90,000km for its torps as per "the changling")..
I find it much more likely that the KLINGON ship was orbiting at warp outside the range of the weapons and reducing its orbit into weapons range while still at warp, this would account for:-
The seconds in between sulu's calls of range.
The contradiction regarding the difficulty of hitting a ship that according to the warsies was inside 30,000km moving at around 1500km/s when we know that the BIG E had impulse and as such can easily match that speed as well as having weapons ranges greater than 30.000km.
Anyway aparantly pointing this out and using a few terms (that leo1 used first in the thread) is enough to get the 3 day ban i pretty much expected the moment i saw him in the thread....
So we have canon dialog to support it warp strafing saying:
1. That the BIG E will be sluggish without warp manouvering.
2. That the hostile ship was attacking at warp speeds.
Now the argument against seems to ignore these two things and claims that the countdown proves that the ship was traveling STL as the ranges and seconds clearly point to sublight.
Now as far as i can see this argument is absurd for several reasons:
1. It ignores the canon dialog regarding speed and warp manouvering.
2. Even if they try to argue a variation of the "picard manouver" with the ship warping in slowing to sublight, firing and then warping out the facts do not fit because the way sulu counts down the approaching ship was moving at around 1500km/s or even slower at ranges starting at 100,000km down to 30,000km or less and if they were doing so what the hell was soooo difficult for the BIG E to hit them or catch them for that matter as the BIG E still had impulse drive and power as well as torps ect (the BIG E has a range of at least 90,000km for its torps as per "the changling")..
I find it much more likely that the KLINGON ship was orbiting at warp outside the range of the weapons and reducing its orbit into weapons range while still at warp, this would account for:-
The seconds in between sulu's calls of range.
The contradiction regarding the difficulty of hitting a ship that according to the warsies was inside 30,000km moving at around 1500km/s when we know that the BIG E had impulse and as such can easily match that speed as well as having weapons ranges greater than 30.000km.
Anyway aparantly pointing this out and using a few terms (that leo1 used first in the thread) is enough to get the 3 day ban i pretty much expected the moment i saw him in the thread....