Starfleet Jedi

HeroHeeto wrote:

StarWarsStarTrek wrote: he looked at the pictures some, but then he put them down and went back to masturbating to pics of wong's wife making good use of her fucking power drill attachments while wong sings the lyrics to the opening track of the new lonely island cd.

Is that from here?

Vibrators - Oversized Monster Toys

"Bam" from Doc Johnson


Description: This is the third and biggest in my new set of huge toys. Bam measures 9½" usable length (the same as John Holmes despite being longer because Bam has bigger balls) x 2.5" diameter (approx. 46½ in³).

Rebecca's Review: When I first saw this toy, my jaw literally dropped. I couldn't see any way that this would fit inside me. It did take some warming up, but I did get him inserted - he has turned out to be a fairly regular visitor to the Maison De Rebecca. As it turns out, it's not quite true that I have equally good orgasms with smaller toys. It seems that I'm a bit of a size queen after all, and Bam's mammoth size gives me something that smaller toys just can't offer. The orgasms are just a little bit more powerful, and the feeling is unique. Mike gets a particular gleam in his eye watching me take Bam.

I think that "particular gleam" says it all.... and thus my question "Why Even Pretend?" has been answered-- that page tells exactly why he's pretending: compensation... as well as exhibitionism via the desire to inappropriately expose his personal kink to the world.

I mean, seriously, 9½" x 2.5"? That's nothing special! Except, obviously, compared to what she's used to.... ROTLFMAO

P.S....



BAM!
BAM BAM BAM!! X^D

You know, you're really starting to make me seriously dislike you. And that's putting it mildly given it would be against board rules to outright insult you. Who the fuck are you to smear Wong for his sexual kinks? And what in God's name do you think you have any right to post it on this site, as if we're just all going to start laughing at his expense?

You and mojo have quickly been earning your way to being the two most disgusting and despised people I have ever had the displeasure to speak to. Yeah, I don't like Leo1, ricrery, Rabbit, or Pointwhateverhisnumberwas for acting like Grade A dicks in debates and I don't like the way most the Vs. Debate mods do their business--which shows I think, evidence of bias.

But that pales--pales in comparison to the shit you're doing. This site isn't about humiliation. I don't care what job x person has, why they have it, and how they got it. I don't care what their sexual orientation is, their kinks, or anything about the type of people they're attracted/married to. How is it that I'm having to actually defend people I don't enjoy debating with half the time because you two want to start spewing hot air?

I'm not a mod or the admin--nor do I pretend to be. But as someone whose been here for some time, I am going to advise you that JMS is not going to put up with this sort of behavior forever. Or long for that matter. It's one thing to repeatedly violate proper debate protocols as some posters have done--it's another to spew hate speech (because that's what it is, even if it doesn't include the word 'asshole', 'dipshit', 'dumbass', and so forth).

Honestly, grow the fuck up. I shouldn't have to be morally outraged after reading your fucking posts. You should all be fucking ashamed at your behavior. You're worse than SWST.

He annoys me.

You both disgust me.

Oh, and that page didn't disgust you?
It's practically his own amateur home-made porn-- we're supposed to just pretend it's not there?

Mith wrote:You know, you're really starting to make me seriously dislike you. And that's putting it mildly given it would be against board rules to outright insult you. Who the fuck are you to smear Wong for his sexual kinks? And what in God's name do you think you have any right to post it on this site, as if we're just all going to start laughing at his expense?

Only if you have a sense of humor-- in which case it's funny because it's true: i.e. he's acting like a huge weenie, in response to having a tiny one.

Seriously. That's what's up with the power-trip with the huge numbers, and going ballistic whenever anyone disproves it. It explains everything perfectly: a Napoleon-complex regarding "Micro-me."

In fact the most recent episode of "South Park" was perfect timing on this issue, linking anger-problems to a junk-shortage; that's why he feels the need to broadcast such gross personal details to the world-- details which pretty much prove that "the man doth protest too much..." and that he's making "Much Ado About Nothing" LOL

And as for how he gets his "kinks:" if he's going to put that info out there, then it's fair game. I didn't ask for it: unlike him, I didn't accuse him of anything for not releasing personal data-- he volunteered it, and that display of "too much information" is just more proof of how he's compensating by pulling a "Janet Jackson Superbowl--" and he's just as mental.

As long as he has this problem being such a huge prick in the vs. debate, it's only fair to point out the source of it in a teensy one; after all, his inferiority-complex is pretty much the source of all this pretending that SW can compete with ST.

And that's just as scientific as any other theory in vs debate.

And oh yeah.....

BAM!
BAM BAM BAM!! X^D

HeroHeeto wrote:Oh, and that page didn't disgust you?
It's practically his own amateur home-made porn-- we're supposed to just pretend it's not there?

Yes.

Yes you are. If you think it's funny and shit, sure go ahead. But I really don't care to make deep, ingrained insults against Wong for whatever sort of sexual life he has. It's really taking things a step too far. Yeah, a few dick jokes are funny, but this is just stupid.

mind you that's incredibly disturbing that his women would actually put that stuff up sorta brings to mind both of them being sorta nutty..and heeroheeto made me LOL..but I don't know if this is the type of forum to do stuff like that on

You know, the thing about this that KSW could spout all the nastiness he wants on the ASVS forum, and get away with it, except for people would truly and openly flame him in return.

Anyway, why don't we go back to actual discussion of the issues involving Star Wars versus Star Trek rather than continuing to drag this out. Hmmm?
-Mike

well mith and I had an exchange going earlier and were making some ground dunno if you feel like continuing it or not

You misunderstood me, I ment continue on within the actual SW versus ST discussion in this thread.
-Mike

Mike DiCenso wrote:You misunderstood me, I ment continue on within the actual SW versus ST discussion in this thread.
-Mike

that's what I meant