sonofccn wrote:You have to have more faith in the world. If you believe it's nothing more then a trap ready to be sprung on you than that is all it is going to be.
I'm a guy who is very pessimistic, but with a naive and sensitive optimistic fiber at the core. I want to think I have a deep faith in humanity, really, but I see a lot that reveals how all of it is shards, and that ranges beyond the political considerations, or knowing if man is more dangerous to man in group or alone. I see that what is good to find in ourselves is hard to obtain, to reach. People don't even dare to help other people, for the fear of feeling overtly...sensitive? Light-hearted? Stupid?
You say the news are bringing you enough of the despair. Don't you feel how we're slowly slipping by design?
What I was told explained a great deal about the issues the whole world keeps going through since the last three centuries, especially the last one.
I talked with people older than me. Fairly established peoples. Some had their own business. We talked about the real. We didn't see how it could change without a massive quake. But we also agreed that we should mind the leader, at any time, as any move should be a sum of the individuals, always.
You say that you get your fair dose of despair through the TV. There are glimpses of faith and clarity, but in general, the vast flux of data spirits the wicked and sick.
My mobile phone keeps receiving "news", and 90% of them are negative, 9% neutral, 1% positive (relative).
There's a sweet ooze of umpending doom these days. The media surely feed this. Revealations, outrage, the people are displeased. But the media make sure the rage is focused on the same old pety bickering, which while it seems extremely important, it is not.
Recently, I learnt that my country, which I thought was a good example of democracy, did in fact declare unlawful the acquisition of certain TV channels.
Why? You can guess, but the idea is simple: it does not fit. It does not fit with the superficial and simple message we get fed with day after day.
On the small scale, I am happy. I have my friends, family, my hobbies, my films, games, music, etc.
On the greater scales, from social, national, to worldwide, I am not. I cannot see how things could change positively for the centuries to come.
That's the point. All people beg for keeping their bubble safe. Their home is their last refuge. But the inside walls of your lair reflect the colours of the media.
I used it for anyone who operates outside the baseline of "normal". I'm not fully sure what sort of "nut" you are refering too.
Nevermind. :D
Some inhibitions are needed for survival, hence why cultures exist in the first place. There has and must always be limits on people. I guess I need more information on just what sort of deviance we are talking about. It isn't like humanity is a group of uniformed blobs we already have radical differnces even in suburbia.
There are differences between social and behavioural models, little between each individual.
Hairdo, clothes, glasses, language, it's generally part of given molds. Yet, how ironic, when the force of the mass is precisely the adhesion to a singular top model, with variances at its base.
You think you can change, you think you can experiment, but the reality is that by the time you start to do so, you'd reach the mold's edge, and a choice comes to you: to jump out or not. What is outside? Would you fall and find social death?
For example, observe how the financial milieu attract millions of people all wearing the same dark/gray suits. Although speculation is based on emotion, it is not empathic, positive human emotion. Humanitarian sane emotion. You cannot untie the tie. You cannot break the dress code. :)
Kinda sucks eh?
That is the logical outcome of removing "strife" from man. If he doesn't have to work to put a roof over his head or food on the table why work at all?
Interesting.
We are getting ahead of the first step. The first step is to come to parity with the effort and reward, with the dispensed and useful. Hedonism is many steps up, and for the moment... irrelevant.
We need, first, to get to the point where the hard work we complete every day, for those who can, lucky or not, is actually useful. We must not get confused between the possible necessity of labour, and the intended goal of such labour. If labour is for the betterment of society, we are on the right path. But we are not.
For eons, prestigious schools have formatted the minds of millions of economists, who are supposedly enjoying a greater understanding of the economical system, as they often pedantically remind us.
How is it that a system put in place by man, poses issues which the greatest minds of the planet have failed to solve for a century?
How can it be that even the wealthiest and most powerful countries of this planet have not managed to break free of the clutches of the vast abyss that syphons our lives?
Why should we believe that tomorrow, we would find the solution to the very mechanical and inhumane power house our leaders have erected?
How do we kill this sort of... vampire? It doesn't seem people even want to know, because it only brings sadness. You then realize the
millions sacrificed.
I'm afraid I'm confused with "credits". Are you refering to our credit card culture, own now pay later mentality or something else?
Well, this mentality is hard to fight back. We live in such times that credit is a necessity. You could avoid credit, but the culture is one of ultra-materialism that encourages relentless consumption of the resources.
The system moves on its own, where it's impossible to figure out who's pulling who, if it's adaptive to the whims of the free people, or crafted and then enforced, slowly. Quick sand standards?
Pff. What kind of house, equipment, mean of transportation can you have if you don't accept credit?
Worse. Why should you pay to have a right to settle on the land, when it is state owned by default, or acquired with private funds surpassing the purchase power of billions?
Your right to live and move is determined by your will to embrace credit.
What is a bad vaccine if I may ask?
One which not uniquely acts preemptively for positive end results to supposedly avoid extremely regretful effects, but would actually end hurting you more.
We keep eating chemically enhanced food. We keep taking pills, drugs, covering ourselves with creams, all to make ourselves healthier and tougher. Yet, we're getting weak, depressed, obese, ill, tired.
Autism, diabetes and cancer keep spreading.
Are our bodies
that defective by nature?
EDIT: by the way, I am not depressed, in case you wonder. I have plenty of projects so forth and so on, I just cross my fingers (ahr ahr) in the hope all goes well, since I believe in them and, well, think they have a lot of potential (aaww... I'd almost call that a big headed remark). I'm excited only to think about how just cool they are... on paper at least. ^_^