Dear god the prior post has exactly what i said....you even quoted it.Your "argument" went like this:
"You have been proven wrong on your believed reason for transsexuality. Hence, you can not be sure about wanting SRS because you can not be sure about your identity.
EVERY time you have been proven wrong (and it is a heck of a lot of times for somebody in a queue to get bits chopped off.......personally id wanna be 100% certain of my facts before such a operation) you have just changed the argument or changed how your initial claim is defined....not a female brain?, you change how YOU define female brain ect ect.
Actually it clearly refers to me thinking you are emotionally unstable and cannot think rationally on the subject. Making absurd claims about having a female brain is a symptom along with your later denial of doing so and attempt to move the goal posts, but it is not the core problem mearly a symptom.You also confirm that later on when you "reason" why you would deny it to me:That clearly referred to your claim that my proposed cause is wrong, yet that has nothing to do with my being sure about myself, as i explained repeatedly.I honestly do not think you are objective enough to make the decision about SRS for yourself and think you should be denied it until you are more emptionally stable.
How can you post 2 quotes to my exact comments and then reinterpret them and make a silly statment claiming something else?. Are you incapable of addrssing the actual comment and need to construct you own so you can actually make a argument?.
It is based on my experiance with you and your tactics regarding the truth on this subject.You have no evidence from which you can reasonably conclude that i am not sure about myself, hence it is based on prejudice either way.
This thread is full of evidence of what i and others consider your emotional instability regarding the subject.There is, because you assume that i am not sure about myself out of the blue. It is a judgment without information - a prejudice.
If it was not true you would be posting a rebuttal as well as not trying to dismiss the truth with a feeble excuse.Any backup for that by actual links and quotes?
Besides, even if that is true, then your appeal to all his other work is still pointless.
That he made it up?, that the APA and DSM are incompetant or part of a conspiracy to abuse children?, because that is what your "made it up" requires for it to be true.Got any refutation other than "lulz"?
You know the documents you CLAIM to have reciently read about the "transgender narrative"...you know in your last post you refered to reading them?...THOSE...LOL.Documented by what?
Considerably more believeable than your claim the APA and DSM are part of a cover up to abuse children...And i would love to see your proof that i lied to my psychologist.
Experiance from reading your lies, absurd creations and exhagerations.Because there is just no way for you to know that - you just conclude it out of your prejudice.
A logical progression.That's just ignorant. Because someone is lying in a very specific case (not that i am), you can not conclude that that person always lies. Another prejudice.
You mean the narrative you ask for documentation of above?......i guess you already have it.....And again, you ignoring what i actually wrote. Such as:Oh, wait, you respond to that - with an argument from personal incredulity.And i originally did not know about "transgender narrative" - the only reason why i am reading up on the whole science of transsexuality is because bigoted people like to distort it in order to justify their hate and prejudice towards transsexual people.
And we are all aware of your revisionist history/story telling.........
FAIL.Yes it is. Because a prejudice is not necessarily a bad thing. Everyone has them.
You could argue that calling someone a prejudist is a bad thing, of course.
But since you do not consider calling all transsexual people liars, i hardly think this is too extreme or unwarranted. And since you are repeatedly judging people without any evidence at all, i can present empirical proof that you have prejudices.
In this very post you confirm that there does exist a "transgender narrative" and you have read it, hence it exists, it is used by transexuals and i clearly say that i am not accusing ALL (also clearly stated in posts above).
For somebody who screams about research you do god awful job even when the real facts are in the very same thread, page and sometimes even post....