And again, nothing but the repetition of the former.
Gosh i must have hit a nerve.
You would like that, wouldn't you?
Encoraging correct/required behaviour with rewards.
Wow, you got something right that takes two minutes to research.
Too bad that Zucker is mostly using negative reinforcement.
That particular examnple is not no.
Then show where he advocates or uses positive reinforcement.
Encoraging or even telling children to play with other toys for several reasons as well as to play with other children is something parents do all the time, you will do so if you ever have kids. I certainly have and while it was not for a gender reason the fact is it is still a regular event in a childs life if they have responsable parents.
If you tell a child to play with someting it does not want to play with, is that positive reinforcement?
Just curious whether you can answer a simple question about psychology.
Angry deluded rantings from any group full of hate do not interest me, but nice distortion of the truth though...really in keeping with your debate tactics and honesty.
Ah, so they are deluded. Not better in any way, you are just digging your deeper and deeper.
The fact is that every responsable parent on the planet does what Zucker does in regards to stopping their children playing with certain kids or taking certain toys off them for one reason or another, its harmless and claiming it is some kind of emotional torture that will cause problems in later life is pathetic.
You are completely ignoring the effect and focus solely on the cause.
Bullshit he expressly says the exact oposite to your claim and is on record doing so.
And because he says so, it must be true.
How about addressing what i actually argued?
What another lovely distortion and strawman, thats a keeper...
Eh, if you can determine a persons whole personality based on some posts, then this is at least as reasonable.
Of course, the first isn't. I now could be childish and claim that i am using your method to show you, but instead i will just say that you said what you said and that you are doing it all over again.
I know you are a liar and a manipulator i know you have insulted me....now im saying that is because of who you are.....you claim you are doing it cos you are transgendered and as such im insulting you because you are transgendered...
Ah, so you think that being transsexual makes you more prone to being dishonest?
How is that not a prejudice?
Also, thanks for admitting that you insult me for being transgendered. What a lovely policy.
Everything about you apart from a bit if cosmetic surgery actually.
Oh, so much ignorance.
But let's do this step by step.
As per your own admission, hormones change it. Thus, my brain structure changes to female, with no discernible difference.
The surgery is so good that there is no discernible difference unless you look for reproductive organs. It is also fully functional, and often even embryology correct.
While the bones do not change, the general body structure does. And gets female.
Grow naturally trough hormone treatment. Are fully functional and in all ways identical to female breasts.
Facial and body hair
: Can be removed without notable traces.
Trainable to be indiscernible from a normal female voice.
The only thing that doesn't actually change. But not noticeable for anyone.
Now, you are of course going to say "but it's all artificial" or something like that.
But that is not only an appeal to nature, but also a genetic fallacy - you are focusing on the origin of something rather than on the something itself. That is fallacious, because it does not address the actual arguments.
In other words, your prejudice has not actual justification. Of course, you do not need one - but you are wrong regardless.
99.9% or more of the make up of a transgender brain matches their natural physical sex, only a tiny anomoly has so far been found and still needs a larger sampling and confirming, plus it has yet to be even close to being certainly defined as making any differance at all to gender issues.
That is wrong for several reasons.
First, most of the brain does not matter in regard to gender. It is also not clearly different between the sexes. Hence, most of your "99.9%" don't matter.
Second, that little part might well be all that matters. Given that we do not know how gender is caused in the brain, you can not rule out this "tiny anomaly" as a cause.
As i said, the evidence is not conclusive. But since you do not want evidence but prejudice and discrimination, you just ignore that and claim that it is.
However you made grand claims regarding it based on your personal bias and deep seeded need to have others think of you as female......... still finally you admit it so hoooray we have progress.
Yet another baseless claim.
Face it, Kor. You are a person with dozens of prejudices towards transsexual people. You have no justification for those prejudices whatsoever. You are arguing for brutal treatments of transsexual people and want to get rid of them if possible, which includes discrimination and segregation. You are unable to understand or present evidence, and you horribly distort it. But there is not a single scientist agreeing with you, not even Zucker. All of them disagree with your prejudice that transwomen are not women.
As i said, you are simply ignorant and prejudiced.