The Sun King:
The Leaf Queen:
The Snow King:
The Flower Queen:
And they needed something called the "Season Scepter" to change Endor's seasons. I DESPERATELY wish I was making this up.
The EU Admits to Being Parallel in Print
-
Khas
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
- Location: Protoss Embassy to the Federation
Re: The EU Admits to Being Parallel in Print
It's not the fact that there are divinities that I find stupid. It's the divinities in question.
The Sun King:
The Leaf Queen:
The Snow King:
The Flower Queen:
And they needed something called the "Season Scepter" to change Endor's seasons. I DESPERATELY wish I was making this up.
The Sun King:
The Leaf Queen:
The Snow King:
The Flower Queen:
And they needed something called the "Season Scepter" to change Endor's seasons. I DESPERATELY wish I was making this up.
-
Picard
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Re: The EU Admits to Being Parallel in Print
It means that things taken straight from the movie - things that, consequently, can be verified by watching the movie (or, I presume, reading the script) - are G-canon, and anything that author threw in is C-canon.Khas wrote:I'm just going by what the most recent update of Wookieepedia says. It said that the novels are G-Canon, but anything that the author just makes up is C-Canon. I don't get it either.
-
Praeothmin
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 3920
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Quebec City
Re: The EU Admits to Being Parallel in Print
That's the way I understand it as well...
-
2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: The EU Admits to Being Parallel in Print
I am very sad I missed out on the canon discussion and sodomy.
I still have no clue how the quote can be confused realistically. The second paragraph is damning. The third paragraph opens with the "happened" line which segues us into a line about EU continuity. There is no self-contradiction or clever undercutting of Lucas here, just an acknowledgement of the dual canons without explicitly calling them such.
I still have no clue how the quote can be confused realistically. The second paragraph is damning. The third paragraph opens with the "happened" line which segues us into a line about EU continuity. There is no self-contradiction or clever undercutting of Lucas here, just an acknowledgement of the dual canons without explicitly calling them such.