
Which got me thinking.... How WOULD the Clone Wars have progressed if the Cardassians (as of, say, 2370) got involved? Who would they side with? Would Palpatine's plot be exposed earlier? What else would change?
Uhm, when did that happen again? I was just about to say that if anything in pre-Discovery 'Trek supported the notion of Star Wars grade fighters being a threat in the 'Trek universe, it would be the Cardassians:2046 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:28 pmIncidentally, as I hint in the Twitter thread I posted of this, there is irony in that the Malevolence arc shows Republic cruisers unable to hit a relatively stationary mega-ship while showing a Cardassian ship known to be able to pop Maquis fighters with relative ease.
https://twitter.com/STvSW/status/117095 ... 97056?s=20
You basically are arguing for flak bursts, then.Darth Spock wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 11:12 pmUhm, when did that happen again? I was just about to say that if anything in pre-Discovery 'Trek supported the notion of Star Wars grade fighters being a threat in the 'Trek universe, it would be the Cardassians:
TNG S:7E:24 "Preemptive Strike" I know disruptors aren't known for their flak bursts, but those explosions are coming from empty space.
The one at the upper left? Given how little the little red wingtip lights are visible, and contrasting that with other scenes of that type of vessel that show them clearly in the front view, plus the fact they seem to get smaller as they go, we can presume those vessels are flying away from the Galor. Even then, however, if the beam was in front of the vessel and the explosion behind, the beam would've basically had to curve around the ship to get to the explosion, at the end. I don't think you can firmly declare the beam to be in front of the ship, in such a circumstance. The beam glow may be overlapping the ship pixels on 'border' areas of the ship, or some other such thing . . . the alternative is mere compositing error. Clearly the explosion is behind it, however.At least one of them ( 1:28-1:29 ) shows the beam passing in the fore of a not distant fighter, but the explosion is behind it as it passes, so that wasn't a strike on something too distant to be seen either.
Going up against a Galor *at all* is unlikely. The Maquis are a smaller force with smaller, less well-protected individual vessels. They cannot sustain losses yet even a massed attack against a large Cardassian warship will naturally entail them.Many of the other near misses appear to be just that. Even if every beam is really striking some distant target, then at that rate the Maquis would have to have committed a hundred fighters or so to the meat grinder just to cripple that one ship. Unlikely under the circumstances.
This is definitely true. They were rather lazily swarming the Cardassian ship.But even at normal speed they weren't outperforming your average SW fighter maneuvering wise.
We're counting a near-total lack of fire as inability? I mean, about fifty seconds in on that video a flight of Hidekis roll right past the Defiant and her escorting Mirandas. Were they mutually unable to attack one another due to targeting inability? Of course not.And or course there's DS9 S:6E:6 "Sacrifice of Angels". Better, but it still involved fighters about the size of the Millennium Falcon flying relatively straight right in front of a massive enemy fleet at sub mach speeds and appearing to incur about 50% losses at most. Better than Disney Star Wars (especially the Rebels cartoon), but not by that much.
Not my first choice in Star Trek, but remembering the proximity blasts from Balance of Terror, I wouldn't completely disregard the idea either. Having said that....
Given the size of the ship in question and the apparent angles, I had my doubts, but after checking closer I see another vessel undeniably in the fore of the beam also appears to be "washed out" by the glow of the same beam. F/X glitch or otherwise, it would appear this was not a solid example of a negative hit after all. So a distant strike does apparently remain a possibility there.The one at the upper left? Given how little the little red wingtip lights are visible, and contrasting that with other scenes of that type of vessel that show them clearly in the front view, plus the fact they seem to get smaller as they go, we can presume those vessels are flying away from the Galor. Even then, however, if the beam was in front of the vessel and the explosion behind, the beam would've basically had to curve around the ship to get to the explosion, at the end. I don't think you can firmly declare the beam to be in front of the ship, in such a circumstance. The beam glow may be overlapping the ship pixels on 'border' areas of the ship, or some other such thing . . . the alternative is mere compositing error. Clearly the explosion is behind it, however.
And this is the main issue I see here. Even without a concrete example of a missed shot, the Cardassians are basically getting their butts kicked by a bunch of guerrilla star fighters. That scene isn’t so much what I would call an example of “popping Maquis fighters with relative ease” so much as “fighting to survive and failing, except to take a few with them.” I know when the subject of fighters in ‘Trek comes up, TNG episode “Conundrum” comes to many people’s minds. This example does not compare well.Going up against a Galor *at all* is unlikely. The Maquis are a smaller force with smaller, less well-protected individual vessels. They cannot sustain losses yet even a massed attack against a large Cardassian warship will naturally entail them.
Not at all. In fact I’m not even trying to speculate why the fighters in SoA weren’t blasted out of the sky, I’m merely pointing out the fact that they weren’t. And their observed performance was on par with what we’ve seen from SW fighters, so it’s not as though they were warp juking their way to the target. My point being that you could just as easily swap that squadron of Peregrines for Y-wings and probably get more or less the same results.We're counting a near-total lack of fire as inability? I mean, about fifty seconds in on that video a flight of Hidekis roll right past the Defiant and her escorting Mirandas. Were they mutually unable to attack one another due to targeting inability? Of course not.And or course there's DS9 S:6E:6 "Sacrifice of Angels". Better, but it still involved fighters about the size of the Millennium Falcon flying relatively straight right in front of a massive enemy fleet at sub mach speeds and appearing to incur about 50% losses at most. Better than Disney Star Wars (especially the Rebels cartoon), but not by that much.
Well, it depends on a number of factors.Khas wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:32 pmSo, in "Rising Malevolence", General Grievous' tactical display clearly shows a Keldon-class starship:
Which got me thinking.... How WOULD the Clone Wars have progressed if the Cardassians (as of, say, 2370) got involved? Who would they side with? Would Palpatine's plot be exposed earlier? What else would change?
In terms of the War itself, likely very little. Palpatine ultimately is controlling both sides and can manipulate events to his own ends. And honestly I'm not sure the Cardassians are clever enough to even figure out the game being played. While they are certainly schemers I always saw them more as Smug Snakes always a little in over their head. Whether its going to war with the Federation or getting in bed with the Dominion.Khas wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2019 8:32 pmSo, in "Rising Malevolence", General Grievous' tactical display clearly shows a Keldon-class starship:
Which got me thinking.... How WOULD the Clone Wars have progressed if the Cardassians (as of, say, 2370) got involved? Who would they side with? Would Palpatine's plot be exposed earlier? What else would change?