LMAO@SpaceBattles!

[Mr. Oragahn]

next time use 'pus-drizzling cock'. 'dick' is just vulgar.

Spot on.

[Kor_Dahar_Master]

Yes, Episky, please be careful. I'm going to let this slide just this one time without an offical warning since you're still relatively new here, and you are understandably fustrated.
-Mike

Oh sorry, I didn't know there was a language rule here, guess I spent too much time on SB won't happen again.

Unlike SB.com you will find that the rules are enforced regardless of your position or preference, as a few of my past warnings and bans can confirm that were gained while arguing with a guy from SDN who came over here to argue with me on a few subjects......one of whitch was if he was a guy or not in fact lol. :D

[User1596]

Apparently forcing a s-mod to punish people who are flaming me gets me this

You have been banned for the following reason:
Long standing issues with debate\behavior, sockpuppet of another user and you contribute nothing to the board but dischord

Date the ban will be lifted: Never

Apparently because they couldn't think of a reason within the rules to ban me they just decided I was a sockpuppet. And apparently I can't even protest the ban to the admins because whichever s-mod banned me blocked my account.

Now to decide should I let this stand or make an actual sockpuppet and continue on as normal.

[Admiral Breetai]

I wouldn't

it is entirely beneath ones dignity to sock puppet in the face of mod Biased...I've never done it even when the place was dear to me..and I would caution against it it's just not worth it

[User1596]

I wouldn't

it is entirely beneath ones dignity to sock puppet in the face of mod Biased...I've never done it even when the place was dear to me..and I would caution against it it's just not worth it

Why not, someone has to do something otherwise they will continue to act that way thinking they can get away with it.

[Mike DiCenso]

Yes, Episky, please be careful. I'm going to let this slide just this one time without an offical warning since you're still relatively new here, and you are understandably fustrated.
-Mike

Oh sorry, I didn't know there was a language rule here, guess I spent too much time on SB won't happen again.

It's not so much the bad language as the vulgar insult to someone, whether they're here or not. And yes, as Kor said, we enforce the rules equally, no matter what side of the debate you're on.
-Mike

[Mike DiCenso]

I wouldn't

it is entirely beneath ones dignity to sock puppet in the face of mod Biased...I've never done it even when the place was dear to me..and I would caution against it it's just not worth it

Why not, someone has to do something otherwise they will continue to act that way thinking they can get away with it.

Yes, and now you've declared your intentions on an open forum. Despite what the loyal opposition says, they do lurk on this forum. So now they may be watching out for you, and they may impose a full IP ban as well.
-Mike

[User1596]

I wouldn't

it is entirely beneath ones dignity to sock puppet in the face of mod Biased...I've never done it even when the place was dear to me..and I would caution against it it's just not worth it

Why not, someone has to do something otherwise they will continue to act that way thinking they can get away with it.

Yes, and now you've declared your intentions on an open forum. Despite what the loyal opposition says, they do lurk on this forum. So now they may be watching out for you, and they may impose a full IP ban as well.
-Mike

Yes I know, I mean it's not like I am not announcing it in such a way as to drive them into paranoid ravings or anything ;)

As to my IP that's what the great internet god made proxies for. :D

[mojo]

I wouldn't

it is entirely beneath ones dignity to sock puppet in the face of mod Biased...I've never done it even when the place was dear to me..and I would caution against it it's just not worth it

Why not, someone has to do something otherwise they will continue to act that way thinking they can get away with it.

they can. and they will.

[Kor_Dahar_Master]

Apparently forcing a s-mod to punish people who are flaming me gets me this

You have been banned for the following reason:
Long standing issues with debate\behavior, sockpuppet of another user and you contribute nothing to the board but dischord

Date the ban will be lifted: Never

Apparently because they couldn't think of a reason within the rules to ban me they just decided I was a sockpuppet. And apparently I can't even protest the ban to the admins because whichever s-mod banned me blocked my account.

Now to decide should I let this stand or make an actual sockpuppet and continue on as normal.

Thanatos is the worst supermod on the board he has banned people like this a few times in the past, he gives a few people (NOT leo1, rama, white_rabbit ect ect obviously as they constantly get free passes and have done for YEARS) temp bans but also perma bans guys like you, that way his actions seem fair to a outside observer (not the mod observer).

SB.com is essentially a victim of its own mod bias, they allow individuals like those i mentioned above free reign accross the board to throw out abuse and ignore other rules like the burden of proof and even support them. As such others deliberatly behave that way and turn the board into a war ground.

Facehugger constantly aids leo1 to ignore or dismiss proof provided by others while supporting leo1's justifications on a subject that have nothing to support them but personal opinion.

SS4 tried to do the same by supporting General Schatten in the thread i linked below, he actually tried to justify me pointing out that "blasting a continent off a planet" is not the same as just searing it in the most absurd example of linguistic acrobatics i have ever seen outside SDN.

He was later in the thread made to look even more stupid as General Schatten (obviously used to SDN levels of moderational bias) expanded on his claim and blew SS4's stupid, absurd and long winded justification for the comment being "scemantics" out of the water.


http://forums.spacebattles.com/showthre ... 355&page=2

[Kor_Dahar_Master]

Stupid double post.

Oh who does he say your sockpuppet was?.

[Khas]

According to Prophet of Truth, Zinc.

[Mike DiCenso]

According to Prophet of Truth, Zinc.

This is becoming silly. Haven't the SBC mods and their buddies claimed several different people as being Zinc without any real proof of such? I'm almost begining to think that the SBC mods created Zinc themselves, much the SDN mods have done in the past with various fake "Trekkie trolls". But in this case they use it to accuse various people they don't like of being Zinc so that they have another excuse to ban them.
-Mike

[Kor_Dahar_Master]

According to Prophet of Truth, Zinc.

This is becoming silly. Haven't the SBC mods and their buddies claimed several different people as being Zinc without any real proof of such? I'm almost begining to think that the SBC mods created Zinc themselves, much the SDN mods have done in the past with various fake "Trekkie trolls". But in this case they use it to accuse various people they don't like of being Zinc so that they have another excuse to ban them.
-Mike

Its easily checked as zinc and episky have accounts on here i think.

[Mike DiCenso]

Moderators (at least as far as SFJN goes) do not have the ability to look up IP information, only the administrator (that is Jedi Master Spock) does. So I couldn't really tell you, nor is it really important to do so as neither of them have seriously bent, much less broken a rule here.
-Mike