While i am here il post a bit of classic SB.com hypocrisy:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=100
So the rant by SS4 came about because of the events in Obsession obviously i reasoned that the effect seen on screen was clearly not going to be achieved with a ounce in mass of AM, in fact even with LOADS it would not happen because of the lack of typical DET effects.
So as we have the effect i looked to the ounce to be a fluid ounce so it was volume and a way to increase the mass to a point it could reasonable power a planet wide trek style disintegration effect like we see has been done to the entire planet.
I also wanted to do this within the bounds of reasonable canon material and logic.
So the justification for them referring to it in fluid ounces were:
1. The fuel in trek is deuterium/Anti-deuterium and is a FLUID.
2. When it is referred to in regards to mass in the series they always use kg.
3. And obviously the stamp on the side of the anti-grav that admittedly i did not fully understand but had seen even individuals like Rama come to a similar reasoned explanation for it.
The counter argument to this was "Ounces usually means mass" that while partly true not only does not always be true (even the wiki link said The fluid ounce is sometimes referred to simply as an "ounce" in applications where its use is implicit") and as per the material above i figured Kirk and Spock implicitly knew the ship they hads fuel was a fluid.
Using a ounce as a unit of mass also ignores that a ounce of AM cannot achieve what we clearly see the material in the episode do.
Anyway he finished off with this as you can see:
Now this goes to all of you:
If you want to make a claim, back it up properly. Do not use your opinion as evidence, it isn't. Inferring something is not actual evidence. You can all debate back and forth over what "Gkg" means, but in the end, we have absolutely no idea what it is.
Anyway numpty boy pulls this out of his ass to try and refute the planet being all but a pool ball with all its features, mountains and seas gone:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=151
Note the admittance of crappy photoshop skills and the conclusion that we are seeing mountains/hills/plains/oceans/etc because of a few shades and crappy photoshop skills.
Now up to this point after SS4's rant i had kept my claims simple and easily provable and figured it was just a wind up to yank my chain doing exactly what SS4 had explicitly told us not to while getting away with it.
Amusingly enough White_rabbit pissed on the image while at the same time supported my actual claim without realizing it (he was in full "its not DET cos" mode and obviously thought that was what i had claimed rather than pointing out the same fact).
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=153
And my reply he was not happy about...:).
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=155
Anyway i made a rather foolish off hand comment about what else the stuff he coloured in could be and took the piss a bit and made a few jokes about the image and figured that was that.
Then i got this from guess who:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=167
As you can imagine i was rather shocked i was being leaned on for a BOP i considered a joke and said so pointing out the absurdness of making any claims from such a image and how doing so could get me into trouble, i also pointed out that it was his initial claim so his BOP:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=174
Facehugger replies with a comment about not making bullshit up myself means bullshit made up by others is some how a valid argument.
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=175
So i replied with this:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=177
Facehuger replies by validating the crap by calling it evidence and saying i need to dismiss this "evidence" rather than Tanly prove it to a acceptable level:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=181
Anyway i make a quick reply to facehugger and then open up a tin of whoop ass on tanly regarding the entire planet:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=187
Any way me and he go back and forth for a while regarding the BOP on the image with him desperate for me to accept the joke i made as a claim so he can demand i prove it, he cites facehugger in this regard but i dismiss that bullshit easily.
Its quite entertaining read through if you like, but as expected facehugger pipes up again to save his drowning man or at least try to. As you can see not only has he tried to shift the burden of proof but has created several strawmen to try to do so in the process.:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=218
So at this point i was about sick of facehugger's usual crap and his new pets so i pointed out a few details regarding his made up bullshit about my claims and points and fleshed out my claim a bit:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=242
Any way that was the last i saw of fachugger in the thread and i followed up with a demand for proof from Tanly
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=246
After that i did not see a post of his in the thread until this rather pathetic squeek:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/showpost ... tcount=263
Oh and in regard to the die is cast he comments about i pointed out in between the posts above if you did not bother to read through (and much to the chagrin of several of the more rabid warsies and 40k wankers) that the VISUAL effect in Obsession supports the fact that large quantities of planetary matter can be disintegrated by Trek weapons without the visual effects those who complain about TDIC go on about and abilities regarding disintegration of matter are available fro many types of weapons in Trek.
As you can imagine canon material that unifies the dialog and visuals in TDIC did not make certain people very happy :).