So can Trek ships use phasers to shoot down torps?
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
So can Trek ships use phasers to shoot down torps?
Just asking. I mean, a torp can't have a defense as good as a ship's, and considering the trajectories of torps and computing abilities of Trek ships, and the gain of shooting a torp with a minimal level of energy instead of waiting for the great megaton energy washing against shields... do ships in Trek attempt to shoot down torps?
It feels odd to me that considering the importance of torps, they wouldn't be using a defense grid system that is much less energy hungry and simpler to put into practice than some shield.
It feels odd to me that considering the importance of torps, they wouldn't be using a defense grid system that is much less energy hungry and simpler to put into practice than some shield.
-
Cpl Kendall
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:30 pm
- Contact:
-
Cpl Kendall
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:30 pm
- Contact:
- 2046
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
- Contact:
-
Cpl Kendall
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:30 pm
- Contact:
- l33telboi
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:15 am
- Location: Finland
Photonic shockwave? As in the anti-matter in the torpedo getting leaked into space? Would be quite dangerous I suppose, as you'd risk getting the anti-matter to react with your hull, instead of against the matter in the torpedo itself.
Wonder how that'd fare against shields though. They're supposed to be gravitic in nature, right? There was a quote about "graviton shielding" or somesuch from Generations, if memory serves. Would be hard for anti-protons to react with that.
...Except if the shields let them through, I mean shields are known to let some some stray particles through.
Any more info on the matter?
Meh, ST has some of nicest tech around when it comes to popular sci-fi, it's a shame they never really capitlized on it. But then, when have we ever seen a sci-fi series/movie/game that does?
Wonder how that'd fare against shields though. They're supposed to be gravitic in nature, right? There was a quote about "graviton shielding" or somesuch from Generations, if memory serves. Would be hard for anti-protons to react with that.
...Except if the shields let them through, I mean shields are known to let some some stray particles through.
Any more info on the matter?
Not really. Given ST technology, point-defense could be oh-so-much better then anything we have today. Best I could think of would be wide-beam setting on ship-phasers. Beaming away incoming projectiles would be nice too, except I recall photorps being shielded.Cpl Kendall wrote:And if they could it would make far more sense to mount a space-CIWS than use the main batteries for it.
Meh, ST has some of nicest tech around when it comes to popular sci-fi, it's a shame they never really capitlized on it. But then, when have we ever seen a sci-fi series/movie/game that does?
-
Cpl Kendall
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:30 pm
- Contact:
I don't mean a literal modern day CIWS mounted on the hull, you could use a low power phaser for example. Tying up the main batteries is just stupid.l33telboi wrote: Not really. Given ST technology, point-defense could be oh-so-much better then anything we have today. Best I could think of would be wide-beam setting on ship-phasers. Beaming away incoming projectiles would be nice too, except I recall photorps being shielded.
-
Mike DiCenso
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
There are several examples all through Trek of at least being mentioned or shown the capability to shoot down various missle-type weapons:
* "Balance of Terror" [TOS1]: Sulu laments not having phasers operational to dedonate the Romulan plasma torpedo chasing them down, though later the phasers are used to destroy point-blank a nuclear proximity bomb the Romulan ship lets go in the Enterprise's path.
* "Patterns of Force" [TOS2]: The phasers are used to shoot and destroy a primitive missle launched at the Enterprise from Nazi planet Ekos.
* "For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky" [TOS3]: The Enterprise's phasers destroy several missles fired at the starship from the Yonada worldship.
* "The Price" [TNG3]: A Ferengi missle is shot down by the E-D's phasers.
All this in addition to the VOY "Workforce, Part II" example. A point-blank CIWS phaser probably would not be for the best as we know that even a single torpedo can dedonate with it's full yeild potential ala the Workforce example, and cause considerable damage. The photon torpedo would probably have to be dedonated at relatively long range to avoid serious damage.
-Mike
* "Balance of Terror" [TOS1]: Sulu laments not having phasers operational to dedonate the Romulan plasma torpedo chasing them down, though later the phasers are used to destroy point-blank a nuclear proximity bomb the Romulan ship lets go in the Enterprise's path.
* "Patterns of Force" [TOS2]: The phasers are used to shoot and destroy a primitive missle launched at the Enterprise from Nazi planet Ekos.
* "For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky" [TOS3]: The Enterprise's phasers destroy several missles fired at the starship from the Yonada worldship.
* "The Price" [TNG3]: A Ferengi missle is shot down by the E-D's phasers.
All this in addition to the VOY "Workforce, Part II" example. A point-blank CIWS phaser probably would not be for the best as we know that even a single torpedo can dedonate with it's full yeild potential ala the Workforce example, and cause considerable damage. The photon torpedo would probably have to be dedonated at relatively long range to avoid serious damage.
-Mike
Last edited by Mike DiCenso on Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Mike DiCenso
- Security Officer
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm
Cpl Kendall wrote:I don't mean a literal modern day CIWS mounted on the hull, you could use a low power phaser for example. Tying up the main batteries is just stupid.l33telboi wrote: Not really. Given ST technology, point-defense could be oh-so-much better then anything we have today. Best I could think of would be wide-beam setting on ship-phasers. Beaming away incoming projectiles would be nice too, except I recall photorps being shielded.
In "Conundrum" [TNG5], the phasers are shown doing something very much like that to destroy in rapid succession several of the Lysian drone pods, though they make use of the second largest of the ships 11 available phaser arrays to do so.
-Mike
- Mr. Oragahn
- Admiral
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Paradise Mountain
If long range is 500 meters, then yes. Having an omnidirectional blast 200-500 meters away from your ship rather than at the surface of your shield is still infinitely better.Mike DiCenso wrote:There are several examples all through Trek of at least being mentioned or shown the capability to shoot down various missle-type weapons:
* "Balance of Terror" [TOS1]: Sulu laments not having phasers operational to dedonate the Romulan plasma torpedo chasing them down, though later the phasers are used to destroy point-blank a nuclear proximity bomb the Romulan ship lets go in the Enterprise's path.
* "Patterns of Force" [TOS2]: The phasers are used to shoot and destroy a primitive missle launched at the Enterprise from Nazi planet Ekos.
* "For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky" [TOS3]: The Enterprise's phasers destroy several missles fireded at the starship from the Yonada worldship.
* "The Price" [TNG3]: A Ferengi missle is shot down by the E-D's phasers.
All this in addition to the VOY "Workforce, Part II" example. A point-blank CIWS phaser probably would not be for the best as we know that even a single torpedo can dedonate with it's full yeild potential ala the Workforce example, and cause considerable damage. The photon torpedo would probably have to be dedonated at relatively long range to avoid serious damage.
-Mike
In first case, if the blast is not directed, the shield will take around 50% of the radiations and all the jazz. At a range of a few hundred meters, the ship's profile will be considerably smaller.
Either they can't track fast moving torps, can't lock on the shields or something because of jamming, or there's just some convenient technobabble at play there.
- Who is like God arbour
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
- Location: Germany
- If we assume, that photon torpedos have shields,
- and in consideration of the fact, that torpedos are able to fly into a sun (TNG: Half a Life or Star Trek Generations) or are able to penetrate through the surface of a planet (TNG: Pen Pals) and their glowing after they are fired (Regarding Photon Torpedo Glow), a not unreasonable assumption,
- To shoot down an own torpedo - and only that was shown in Star Trek - one has only to know the shield frequency of the own torpedos or to order the torpedo remotely to drop the shields.
- Why however a torpedo, that is hit with a phaser, is supposed to explode more powerful than as if it would explode regular, is curious. But that was the impression, I have got from the Voyager episode Workforce. Kim has said, that he can't penetrate the shields of the two pursuing Quarren patrol ships and only then has the Emergency Command Hologram got the idea to emulate the tactic, the Romulan captain has used at the battle of Vorkado, by creating a photonic shock wave between the two pursuing Quarren patrol ships to disable them. To fire directly at the ships has failed to disable them, but the photonic shock wave was enough to do it. Either it is more powerful than a regular photon torpedo explosion or the photonic shock wave has another unknown, but more disastrous effect to the ship systems.
- l33telboi
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:15 am
- Location: Finland
Usually when people mention CIWS they do refer to modern day point-defense systems, hence the confusion. But it's no biggie.Cpl Kendall wrote:I don't mean a literal modern day CIWS mounted on the hull, you could use a low power phaser for example. Tying up the main batteries is just stupid.
In any case, you probably know the phasers can vary their power output, right? So why would you fire the phasers at maximum against a torpedo if you can just as well dial down the strength of the beam?
- Who is like God arbour
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 1155
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:00 pm
- Location: Germany
Because, if in a battle, several torpedos are flying at your ship, an autonomous specialised (point) defense system, that will target and (if possible at all) destroy incoming torpedos would be better than the usage of the main weapon system, which would be, because it is occupied with destroying oncoming torpedos, unavailable at that moment to fire at the enemy ship, that fires the torpedos at your ship in the first place.l33telboi wrote:In any case, you probably know the phasers can vary their power output, right? So why would you fire the phasers at maximum against a torpedo if you can just as well dial down the strength of the beam?
But the question, if it is possible to overcome the torpedo shields and destroy an enemy torpedo in the short time, the torpedo needs, to reach your ship, still stands.
- l33telboi
- Starship Captain
- Posts: 910
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:15 am
- Location: Finland
Given the rate of fire the phasers have been shown to have, you'd be talking about a heck of a lot of torpedoes in order to tie up the phasers system for any prolonged period of time.Who is like God arbour wrote:Because, if in a battle, several torpedos are flying at your ship, an autonomous specialised (point) defense system, that will target and (if possible at all) destroy incoming torpedos would be better than the usage of the main weapon system, which would be, because it is occupied with destroying oncoming torpedos, unavailable at that moment to fire at the enemy ship, that fires the torpedos at your ship in the first place.
Don’t get me wrong, what you're suggesting is possible. But to me it seems highly unlikely that this should become much of a problem in your average engagement.