Clone Wars Sneak Peek: Gatling Blaster

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Post Reply
User avatar
2046
Starship Captain
Posts: 2046
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
Contact:

Clone Wars Sneak Peek: Gatling Blaster

Post by 2046 » Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:48 am

Hereis the pic.

Though we cannot see the whole weapon, its existence has certain implications for blasters, does it not? Overheating comes to mind, given that it was mention previously in the ANH novelization:

" For a long moment he examined the featureless convex metal wall. Turning his pistol to maximum and hoping it wouldn't melt in his hand before it broke through, he opened fire on the door. When the weapon became too hot to hold, he tossed it from hand to hand. As he did so the smoke had time to clear, and he saw with some surprise that the door had been blown away."

But what exactly is overheating? Power cell? Galvened beam generator? The barrel itself?

The power cell wouldn't seem to be the culprit, given the gatling gun setup. It seems either the beam generator or the barrel itself would have to be it . . . and the barrel seems unlikely given the heat conduction to the handle of Luke's blaster rifle thingy.

So I'd wager it's the galvened beam generator assembly, unless there's something else I'm missing.

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:02 pm

There was a similar gatling weapon in the animes if I recall correctly.
Moreso, in ROTS, we see a B-1 firing its rifle on auto at a good rate, from a balcony of some sort. That's when clones attack the CIS on Utapau, as Biwan decides to chase Gravy.

If there has to be a logic, I wonder if the shots will be more powerful than the traditional blaster firepower.

Brokeback Mountain.

User avatar
l33telboi
Starship Captain
Posts: 910
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:15 am
Location: Finland

Post by l33telboi » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:37 pm

Indeed. Depending on the rate of fire on that thing, this could be the reason why blasters, while they can have a high ROF for a very short period (a few shots) are almost always used in lower ROFs.

Kazeite
Bridge Officer
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:45 pm
Location: Polish Commonwealth

Post by Kazeite » Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:49 pm

Yeah, there was this scene in Clone Wars cartoon where one trooper comes out, wielding gatling blaster, and then another comes out, pulling out something that looked like Millennium Falcon's turret gun from behind his back. I half expected another one to pull out mini-Death Star laser :D

Anyway, my credits are on barrel overheating. After all, this is why our gatling guns have multiple barrels.

Flectarn
Bridge Officer
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 4:34 am

Post by Flectarn » Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:03 pm

yeah, it really dosn't make sense for it to be a gatling gun unless your worried about the barrel over heating. if it were something else... you would, um, rotate that
Last edited by Flectarn on Thu Sep 18, 2008 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Roondar
Jedi Knight
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:03 pm

Post by Roondar » Thu Sep 18, 2008 7:43 pm

Considering blasters are -basically- devices that fling globs of 'rather hot goo' at people/objects it stands to reason that the barrel overheating can be a problem.

User avatar
2046
Starship Captain
Posts: 2046
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:14 pm
Contact:

Post by 2046 » Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:22 am

Flectarn wrote:yeah, it really dosn't make sense for it to be a gatling gun unless your worried about the barrel over heating. if it were something else... you would, um, rotate that
Unless there's more in the barrel than just the barrel. If there is a galvened beam generator or somesuch thingamabob in there too (one with each barrel), you could alternately take those six and make them rotate like a six-shooter with just one barrel serving them, but perhaps that would be less efficient or more prone to error or leakage insofar as getting the blaster bolt headed down the barrel tube properly.

We are, of course, conjecturing largely in the absence of fact. All possibilities have to be on the table.

Post Reply