List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

For polite and reasoned discussion of Star Wars and/or Star Trek.
Post Reply
Kor_Dahar_Master
Starship Captain
Posts: 1246
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Kor_Dahar_Master » Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:05 am

StarWarsStarTrek wrote:Nations in Star Wars are planets, as is clearly shown in every populated planet we ever hear about.
So the Gungans and the Amidala's people were one nation in TPM now?.

(And lol cos spell checker wants to make Gungans Hungarians)
Geez. Can someone explain this *beep* why one shall not use Coruscant-like planets as part of the overall sample of how populated NATIONS might be?
You have already done so quite clearly, it is not understanding he lacks it is acceptance of the truth 9as usual).

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Admiral Breetai » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:05 pm

didnt I dedicate like multiple pages on at least two threads explaining why Curoscant is an extreme exception to the norm?

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Praeothmin » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:33 pm

Don't worry Breetai, SWST will continue ignoring anything that goes against his views, like the fact that most planets in SW are NOT like Coruscant, for example, Geonosis, Naboo, Tatooine, Hoth, Endor, Ryloth, Mustaphar, Dantooine, Korriban, Oberon, etc, etc...

The only other Coruscant-like planet we've seen is Naar Shadda, that's it...
Chrystophsys seems to be between Tatooine and Coruscant...

User avatar
Khas
Starship Captain
Posts: 1289
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Location: Protoss Embassy to the Federation

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Khas » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:02 pm

And even then, Nar Shaddaa only has a population of 75 billion, nowhere near Coruscant's 1 trillion.

P.S. Praeo, I think you mean Alderaan instead of Oberon. Oberon is a moon of Uranus.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Praeothmin » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:32 pm

Nope, I meant Onderon from Kotor II...

User avatar
Khas
Starship Captain
Posts: 1289
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm
Location: Protoss Embassy to the Federation

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Khas » Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:00 pm

Oh. And Onderon existed in SW before KOTOR.

Admiral Breetai
Starship Captain
Posts: 1813
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Admiral Breetai » Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:14 am

What I don't get is for example if there are hundreds of quadrillions of people in the galaxy, that worlds as industrialized and developed as the capital why is it they could only muster in the EU twenty five thousand ISD's and maybe a half a million other ships? why are worlds like Curoscant so massively burdensome that they need to import water for christs sakes...Jesus i mean the entire expansion region is a depleted territory barely holding onto its former glory and this is by and large due to the massive burden of sustaining the core worlds specifically the capital?

this is canon from the EU no less while it is not from SWST's bible the ICS or his pope Wong it is from viable and consistent canon sources hell the expansion region was so resentful at its being essentially pimped out by Curoscant a huge portion of the imperial fleet was tied down maintaining order there and as a result took the alliance nearly twenty years to get there..and when they did and took Curo as the capital the ER basically tossed a middle finger at the alliance

I mean seriously WTF how can you even rationalize or even consent to cite the ICS population figures in the face of this and this is something like nearly eighteen years of consistent writing no less

and of course going by the movies the imperial capital is basically the only planet we see with a population higher than say a billion or so (nabu seems to be a stretch its not the average planet and even then it seems to have a very small population ) with most worlds even the damn CIS strongholds all seemingly having hundreds of thousands to millions

we see the burden on the industry is so great that there are likely more Battlestars in NBSG than there are ISD's heck B5 could muster larger fleets then we saw at Endor i mean seriously the single greatest fleet engagement in the history of the star wars movie universe was ep3 battle and likely only a few hundred ships if that participated

what that tells me is man power and resource and production are very small compared to other such galactic civilizations and that the galaxies population maybe reach nine hundred or so trillion..but its more than likely its much smaller with the vast majority of the population being concentrated on the capital..and in the inner sectors of the galaxy

honestly SWST how long can you ignore this and still remain honest with yourself?

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:33 am

Admiral Breetai wrote:What I don't get is for example if there are hundreds of quadrillions of people in the galaxy, that worlds as industrialized and developed as the capital why is it they could only muster in the EU twenty five thousand ISD's and maybe a half a million other ships? why are worlds like Curoscant so massively burdensome that they need to import water for christs sakes...Jesus i mean the entire expansion region is a depleted territory barely holding onto its former glory and this is by and large due to the massive burden of sustaining the core worlds specifically the capital?

this is canon from the EU no less while it is not from SWST's bible the ICS or his pope Wong it is from viable and consistent canon sources hell the expansion region was so resentful at its being essentially pimped out by Curoscant a huge portion of the imperial fleet was tied down maintaining order there and as a result took the alliance nearly twenty years to get there..and when they did and took Curo as the capital the ER basically tossed a middle finger at the alliance

I mean seriously WTF how can you even rationalize or even consent to cite the ICS population figures in the face of this and this is something like nearly eighteen years of consistent writing no less

and of course going by the movies the imperial capital is basically the only planet we see with a population higher than say a billion or so (nabu seems to be a stretch its not the average planet and even then it seems to have a very small population ) with most worlds even the damn CIS strongholds all seemingly having hundreds of thousands to millions

we see the burden on the industry is so great that there are likely more Battlestars in NBSG than there are ISD's heck B5 could muster larger fleets then we saw at Endor i mean seriously the single greatest fleet engagement in the history of the star wars movie universe was ep3 battle and likely only a few hundred ships if that participated

what that tells me is man power and resource and production are very small compared to other such galactic civilizations and that the galaxies population maybe reach nine hundred or so trillion..but its more than likely its much smaller with the vast majority of the population being concentrated on the capital..and in the inner sectors of the galaxy

honestly SWST how long can you ignore this and still remain honest with yourself?
Trouble is, there's a problem of scale, as usual. Secondly, there's Saxton, who clearly did what was necessary to distill enough poison so that a rather hard to maintain consistency would get further eroded. Thirdly, you have the fact that some topics had never been really dealt with. Like galactic population. Fourth, you have the prequels and Lucas, which forced the EU to retcon some material and obviously, made many people reconsider their view of the universe that Star Wars was.

Now, I consider that 1 trillion for Coruscant is a bit low, but it we're supposed to think in terms of what makes sense, I'd say that Coruscant itself makes no damn sense at all. I've seen many descriptions of the Republic and how it's a wonderful democracy that spread peace, "intellectualism" and technology to the four corners of the galaxy, yet the people of Coruscant were somehow too dumb and too poor to actually think of leaving that shit hole and live somewhere else? Since, honestly, no sane mind would ever agree to live on such a world. It baffles the mind precisely because it's totally nonsensical. The likes of New York and Tokyo are already driving people to the limits of what the human mind can withstand, and there's more people in one cubic mile of the upper crust of Coruscant than in those two cities combined (I think, I'm just throwing numbers here).

The Atlas is a great attempt at trying to depict a solid view of the SW galaxy, but it has its own issues.
For one, it introduced a new figure for the population of Naboo. Now, I don't know if it's meant to be a population figure for another age, but it's clearly not fitting with anything remotely close to the era between TPM or anything of the EU around the GE that we saw about this planet - it had barely changed at all.
It also gave us a view of the population density on the galactic scale, and there's somehow a problem here, as it shows that there are too many regions with low pop densities.
The multi-quadrillion figures are already problematic.
It would be far better for the total sentient pop to be rated in the trillions, with Coruscant taking a big piece of it.
I pretty much doubt that Lucas believes that there are many Coruscant-like places in his universe.

The problem of scales being that Lucas introduced it very early with his Death Stars that pop out of nowhere. Well, the first one took some time to build -and heck, despite his so called insane attention to detail, he insisted that the already very advanced station we see at the end of ROTS was the Death Star, while its structure didn't even correspond to that of the battle station we knew in ANH.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Mike DiCenso » Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:45 pm

This has gotten way off topic, so I'm transfering these recent posts to the Tech section.
-Mike

StarWarsStarTrek
Starship Captain
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:28 pm

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by StarWarsStarTrek » Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:06 am

HELLO.

Due to various personal, business and other reasons, my activity on this board has significantly decreased. Please do not take this as a sign of me "dodging questions" or "ignoring points". I have enjoyed my time on these boards, and will try and respond to my various debates when I can.

Thank you.

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Mike DiCenso » Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:43 am

No problem, and looking forward to it. Just don't overtake yourself.
-Mike

User avatar
Mr. Oragahn
Admiral
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Paradise Mountain

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Mr. Oragahn » Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:14 pm

Mmm... Rama, aside from using words such as "ascribe" or "heinous" wrongly in order to prove that he has reached level 80 in vocabulary (lol), recently claimed that Coruscant isn't the most populated planet.

User avatar
mojo
Starship Captain
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:47 am

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by mojo » Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:05 am

Mr. Oragahn wrote:Mmm... Rama, aside from using words such as "ascribe" or "heinous" wrongly in order to prove that he has reached level 80 in vocabulary (lol), recently claimed that Coruscant isn't the most populated planet.
but using 'heinous' just shows you've reached level 80 in 'watching bill and ted'.

User avatar
Praeothmin
Jedi Master
Posts: 3920
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Praeothmin » Mon Oct 03, 2011 1:20 pm

Mr. Oragahn wrote:Mmm... Rama, aside from using words such as "ascribe" or "heinous" wrongly in order to prove that he has reached level 80 in vocabulary (lol), recently claimed that Coruscant isn't the most populated planet.
Am I the only one that noticed he failed to provide any evidence for his claim?

Mike DiCenso
Security Officer
Posts: 5839
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:49 pm

Re: List of expanded universe sources incompatible with ICS

Post by Mike DiCenso » Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:25 pm

This is getting a bit off-topic as discussing anything about how Rama on SBC fails to provide evidence of continent-spanning cities on other SW worlds is not really relevant to listing EU sources that contradict the ICS.

Also, it doesn't matter what the EU says about Coruscant and other worlds, since we know from the TPM novelization that Coruscant was unique among planets in the galaxy, and this is borne out by the depiction of SW planets throughout the six movies and the TCW.
-Mike

Post Reply